![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Return to Summarization The problem of using topic representations for multi-document summarization (MDS) has received considerable attention recently. In this paper, we describe five different topic representations and introduce a novel representation of topics based on topic themes. We present eight different methods of generating MDS and evaluate each of these methods on a large set of topics used in past DUC workshops. Our evaluation results show a significant improvement in the quality of summaries based on topic themes over MDS methods that use other alternative topic representations. @inproceedings{1076071, author = {Sanda Harabagiu and Finley Lacatusu}, title = {Topic themes for multi-document summarization}, booktitle = {SIGIR '05: Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval}, year = {2005}, isbn = {1-59593-034-5}, pages = {202--209}, location = {Salvador, Brazil}, doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1076034.1076071}, publisher = {ACM Press}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, } ![]() ©2006 Association for Computing Machinery |