![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Return to Poster Session This paper describes an exploratory study of note taking at academic conferences. 1 Evan Golub, On audience activities during presentations, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, v.20 n.3, p.38-46, February 2005 2 Catherine C. Marshall , A. J. Bernheim Brush, Exploring the relationship between personal and public annotations, Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, June 07-11, 2004, Tuscon, AZ, USA}, ![]() ©2006 Association for Computing Machinery |