![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Return to Poster Session We examine which NASA Technical Report Server (NTRS) repositories have received the most downloads during 15 months of operation. In particular, we explore the collection development policy of including non-NASA scientific, technology and medicine (STM) repositories. We found that three of the four non-NASA repositories included in NTRS contributed little to the overall download totals. 1 Nelson, M.L., Rocker, J., Harrison, T.L. OAI and NASA Scientific and Technical Information, Library Hi-Tech, 21, 2 (2003), 140--150.}, ![]() ©2006 Association for Computing Machinery |