Welcome to D
SIGMOD 2005
PODS 2005
SIGMOD-RECOR
CIDR 2005
CIKM 2005
COMAD 2005
CVDB 2005
DaMoN 2005
Data Enginee
DEBS05
DMSN 2005
DOLAP 2005
GIR 2005
GIS 2005
Hypertext 20
ICDE 2005
ICDM 2005
IHIS 2005
IQIS 2005
JCDL 2005
KRAS 2005
MDM 2005
MIR 2005
MobiDE 2005
P2PIR 2005
RIDE 2005
SBBD 2005
SIGIR 2005
SIGIR-FORUM
SIGKDD 2005
SIGKDD-EXP
SSDBM 2005
TIME 2005
TKDE 2005
<<< = TKDE'05 Pape>>>
TODS 2005
VLDB 2005
VLDBJ 2005
WebDB 2005
WIDM 2005

Antipole tree indexing to support range search and k-nearest neighbor search in metric spaces


Domenico Cantone, Alfredo Ferro, Alfredo Pulvirenti, Diego Reforgiato Recupero, and Dennis Shasha

  View Paper (PDF)  

Return to April 2005, Volume 17, Issue 4


Abstract

Range and k-nearest neighbor searching are core problems in pattern recognition. Given a database S of objects in a metric space M and a query object q in M, in a range searching problem the goal is to find the objects of S within some threshold distance to g, whereas in a k-nearest neighbor searching problem, the k elements of S closest to q must be produced. These problems can obviously be solved with a linear number of distance calculations, by comparing the query object against every object in the database. However, the goal is to solve such problems much faster. We combine and extend ideas from the M-tree, the multivantage point structure, and the FQ-tree to create a new structure in the "bisector tree" class, called the Antipole tree. Bisection is based on the proximity to an "Antipole" pair of elements generated by a suitable linear randomized tournament. The final winners a, b of such a tournament is far enough apart to approximate the diameter of the splitting set. If dist(a, b) is larger than the chosen cluster diameter threshold, then the cluster is split. The proposed data structure is an indexing scheme suitable for (exact and approximate) best match searching on generic metric spaces. The Antipole tree outperforms by a factor of approximately two existing structures such as list of clusters, M-trees, and others and, in many cases, it achieves better clustering properties.


©2006 Association for Computing Machinery