Welcome to D
SIGMOD 2004
PODS 2004
SIGMOD RECOR
CIKM 2004
DASFAA 2004
DBPL 2003
DE-BULLETIN
DEBS 2004
DMKD 2004
DMSN 2004
DOLAP 2004
DPDJ 2004
EDBT 2004
ER 2003
GIS 2004
HDP 2004
HYPERTEXT 20
ICDE 2004
ICDT 2003
JCDL 2004
MDM
MIR 2004
MIS 2004
MMDB 2004
MOBIDE 2003
RIDE 2004
SBBD 2003
SIGIR FORUM
SIGIR 2004
<<< = SIGIR'04 Pap>>>
SIGKDD EXPLO
SIGKDD 2004
SSDBM 2004
SSTD 2003
TIME 2004
TODS 2004
VLDB 2004
VLDB Journal
WEBDB 2004
WIDM 2004
XIME-P 2004
Footer

Comparison of using passages and documents for blind relevance feedback in information retrieval


Zhenmei Gu and Ming Luo

  View Paper (PDF)  

Return to Posters


Abstract

This paper compares document blind feedback and passage blind feedback in Information Retrieval (IR), based on the work during the NRRC 2003 Reliable Information Access Summer workshop. The analysis of our experimental results shows overall consistency on the performance impact of using passages and documents for blind feedback. However, it is observed that the behavior of passage blind feedback, compared to document blind feedback, is both system dependent and topic dependent. The relationships between the performance impact of passage blind feedback and the number of feedback terms and the topic's average relevant document length, respectively, are examined to illustrate these dependencies.

BIBTEX


@inproceedings{1009081,   author = {Zhenmei Gu and Ming Luo},
  title = {Comparison of using passages and documents for blind relevance feedback in information retrieval},
  booktitle = {SIGIR '04: Proceedings of the 27th annual international conference on Research and development in information retrieval},
  year = {2004},
  isbn = {1-58113-881-4},
  pages = {482--483},
  location = {Sheffield, United Kingdom},
  doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1008992.1009081},
  publisher = {ACM Press},
  
}



©2005 Association for Computing Machinery