Welcome to DiSC 2003
SIGMOD 2002
PODS 2002
 SIGMOD RECORD 2002
 ADBIS 2002
CIKM 2002
CoopIS 2002
 EDBT 2002
 ER 2002
Data Engineering Bul
DEXA_EC-WEB 2002
DMKD 2002
 DPDJ 2002
HYPERTEXT 2002
ICDE 2002
ICDM 2002
JCDL 2002
KDD 2002
 KDD_EXPLORATIONS 20
KRDB 2002
MDM 2002
MIS 2002
RIDE 2002
SBBD 2002
 SIGIR 2002
 SIGIR FORUM 2002
SSDBM 2002
TODS 2002
<<< = TODS'02 Issues>>>
TIME 2002
VLDB 2002
VLDBJ 2002

Searching in metric spaces with user-defined and approximate distances


Paolo Ciaccia and Marco Patella

  View Paper (PDF)  

Return to Number 4, December 2002


Abstract

Novel database applications, such as multimedia, data mining, e-commerce, and many others, make intensive use of similarity queries in order to retrieve the objects that better fit a user request. Since the effectiveness of such queries improves when the user is allowed to personalize the similarity criterion according to which database objects are evaluated and ranked, the development of access methods able to efficiently support user-defined similarity queries becomes a basic requirement. In this article we introduce the first index structure, called the QIC-M-tree, that can process user-defined queries in generic metric spaces, that is, where the only information about indexed objects is their relative distances. The QIC-M-tree is a metric access method that can deal with several distinct distances at a time: (1) a query (user-defined) distance, (2) an index distance (used to build the tree), and (3) a comparison (approximate) distance (used to quickly discard from the search uninteresting parts of the tree). We develop an analytical cost model that accurately characterizes the performance of the QIC-M-tree and validate such model through extensive experimentation on real metric data sets. In particular, our analysis is able to predict the best evaluation strategy (i.e., which distances to use) under a variety of configurations, by properly taking into account relevant factors such as the distribution of distances, the cost of computing distances, and the actual index structure. We also prove that the overall saving in CPU search costs when using an approximate distance can be estimated by using information on the data set only (thus such measure is independent of the underlying access method) and show that performance results are closely related to a novel "indexing" error measure.


DiSC'03 © 2003 Association for Computing Machinery